Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Journal of Stroke ; : 388-398, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1001587

ABSTRACT

Background@#and Purpose Differences in measurement of the extent of acute ischemic stroke using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score (ASPECTS) by non-contrast computed tomography (CT-ASPECTS stratum) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-ASPECTS stratum) may impact the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with a large ischemic core. @*Methods@#The RESCUE-Japan LIMIT (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism Japan–Large IscheMIc core Trial) was a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of EVT in patients with ASPECTS of 3–5. CT-ASPECTS was prioritized when both CT-ASPECTS and DWI-ASPECTS were measured. The effects of EVT on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days were assessed separately for each stratum. @*Results@#Among 183 patients, 112 (EVT group, 53; No-EVT group, 59) were in the CT-ASPECTS stratum and 71 (EVT group, 40; No-EVT group, 31) in the DWI-ASPECTS stratum. The common odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) of the EVT group for one scale shift of the mRS score toward 0 was 1.29 (0.65–2.54) compared to the No-EVT group in CT-ASPECTS stratum, and 6.15 (2.46–16.3) in DWI-ASPECTS stratum with significant interaction between treatment assignment and mode of imaging study (P=0.002). There were significant interactions in the improvement of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 48 hours (CT-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 1.95; DWIASPECTS stratum: OR, 14.5; interaction P=0.035) and mortality at 90 days (CT-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 2.07; DWI-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 0.23; interaction P=0.008). @*Conclusion@#Patients with ASPECTS of 3–5 on MRI benefitted more from EVT than those with ASPECTS of 3–5 on CT.

2.
Thanh-N. NGUYEN; Muhammad-M. QURESHI; Piers KLEIN; Hiroshi YAMAGAMI; Mohamad ABDALKADER; Robert MIKULIK; Anvitha SATHYA; Ossama-Yassin MANSOUR; Anna CZLONKOWSKA; Hannah LO; Thalia-S. FIELD; Andreas CHARIDIMOU; Soma BANERJEE; Shadi YAGHI; James-E. SIEGLER; Petra SEDOVA; Joseph KWAN; Diana-Aguiar DE-SOUSA; Jelle DEMEESTERE; Violiza INOA; Setareh-Salehi OMRAN; Liqun ZHANG; Patrik MICHEL; Davide STRAMBO; João-Pedro MARTO; Raul-G. NOGUEIRA; Espen-Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN; Georgios TSIVGOULIS; Virginia-Pujol LEREIS; Alice MA; Christian ENZINGER; Thomas GATTRINGER; Aminur RAHMAN; Thomas BONNET; Noémie LIGOT; Sylvie DE-RAEDT; Robin LEMMENS; Peter VANACKER; Fenne VANDERVORST; Adriana-Bastos CONFORTO; Raquel-C.T. HIDALGO; Daissy-Liliana MORA-CUERVO; Luciana DE-OLIVEIRA-NEVES; Isabelle LAMEIRINHAS-DA-SILVA; Rodrigo-Targa MARTÍNS; Letícia-C. REBELLO; Igor-Bessa SANTIAGO; Teodora SADELAROVA; Rosen KALPACHKI; Filip ALEXIEV; Elena-Adela CORA; Michael-E. KELLY; Lissa PEELING; Aleksandra PIKULA; Hui-Sheng CHEN; Yimin CHEN; Shuiquan YANG; Marina ROJE-BEDEKOVIC; Martin ČABAL; Dusan TENORA; Petr FIBRICH; Pavel DUŠEK; Helena HLAVÁČOVÁ; Emanuela HRABANOVSKA; Lubomír JURÁK; Jana KADLČÍKOVÁ; Igor KARPOWICZ; Lukáš KLEČKA; Martin KOVÁŘ; Jiří NEUMANN; Hana PALOUŠKOVÁ; Martin REISER; Vladimir ROHAN; Libor ŠIMŮNEK; Ondreij SKODA; Miroslav ŠKORŇA; Martin ŠRÁMEK; Nicolas DRENCK; Khalid SOBH; Emilie LESAINE; Candice SABBEN; Peggy REINER; Francois ROUANET; Daniel STRBIAN; Stefan BOSKAMP; Joshua MBROH; Simon NAGEL; Michael ROSENKRANZ; Sven POLI; Götz THOMALLA; Theodoros KARAPANAYIOTIDES; Ioanna KOUTROULOU; Odysseas KARGIOTIS; Lina PALAIODIMOU; José-Dominguo BARRIENTOS-GUERRA; Vikram HUDED; Shashank NAGENDRA; Chintan PRAJAPATI; P.N. SYLAJA; Achmad-Firdaus SANI; Abdoreza GHOREISHI; Mehdi FARHOUDI; Elyar SADEGHI-HOKMABADI; Mazyar HASHEMILAR; Sergiu-Ionut SABETAY; Fadi RAHAL; Maurizio ACAMPA; Alessandro ADAMI; Marco LONGONI; Raffaele ORNELLO; Leonardo RENIERI; Michele ROMOLI; Simona SACCO; Andrea SALMAGGI; Davide SANGALLI; Andrea ZINI; Kenichiro SAKAI; Hiroki FUKUDA; Kyohei FUJITA; Hirotoshi IMAMURA; Miyake KOSUKE; Manabu SAKAGUCHI; Kazutaka SONODA; Yuji MATSUMARU; Nobuyuki OHARA; Seigo SHINDO; Yohei TAKENOBU; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO; Kazunori TOYODA; Takeshi UWATOKO; Nobuyuki SAKAI; Nobuaki YAMAMOTO; Ryoo YAMAMOTO; Yukako YAZAWA; Yuri SUGIURA; Jang-Hyun BAEK; Si-Baek LEE; Kwon-Duk SEO; Sung-Il SOHN; Jin-Soo LEE; Anita-Ante ARSOVSKA; Chan-Yong CHIEH; Wan-Asyraf WAN-ZAIDI; Wan-Nur-Nafisah WAN-YAHYA; Fernando GONGORA-RIVERA; Manuel MARTINEZ-MARINO; Adrian INFANTE-VALENZUELA; Diederik DIPPEL; Dianne-H.K. VAN-DAM-NOLEN; Teddy-Y. WU; Martin PUNTER; Tajudeen-Temitayo ADEBAYO; Abiodun-H. BELLO; Taofiki-Ajao SUNMONU; Kolawole-Wasiu WAHAB; Antje SUNDSETH; Amal-M. AL-HASHMI; Saima AHMAD; Umair RASHID; Liliana RODRIGUEZ-KADOTA; Miguel-Ángel VENCES; Patrick-Matic YALUNG; Jon-Stewart-Hao DY; Waldemar BROLA; Aleksander DĘBIEC; Malgorzata DOROBEK; Michal-Adam KARLINSKI; Beata-M. LABUZ-ROSZAK; Anetta LASEK-BAL; Halina SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ; Jacek STASZEWSKI; Piotr SOBOLEWSKI; Marcin WIĄCEK; Justyna ZIELINSKA-TUREK; André-Pinho ARAÚJO; Mariana ROCHA; Pedro CASTRO; Patricia FERREIRA; Ana-Paiva NUNES; Luísa FONSECA; Teresa PINHO-E-MELO; Miguel RODRIGUES; M-Luis SILVA; Bogdan CIOPLEIAS; Adela DIMITRIADE; Cristian FALUP-PECURARIU; May-Adel HAMID; Narayanaswamy VENKETASUBRAMANIAN; Georgi KRASTEV; Jozef HARING; Oscar AYO-MARTIN; Francisco HERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ; Jordi BLASCO; Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-VÁZQUEZ; Antonio CRUZ-CULEBRAS; Francisco MONICHE; Joan MONTANER; Soledad PEREZ-SANCHEZ; María-Jesús GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ; Marta GUILLÁN-RODRÍGUEZ; Gianmarco BERNAVA; Manuel BOLOGNESE; Emmanuel CARRERA; Anchalee CHUROJANA; Ozlem AYKAC; Atilla-Özcan ÖZDEMIR; Arsida BAJRAMI; Songul SENADIM; Syed-I. HUSSAIN; Seby JOHN; Kailash KRISHNAN; Robert LENTHALL; Kaiz-S. ASIF; Kristine BELOW; Jose BILLER; Michael CHEN; Alex CHEBL; Marco COLASURDO; Alexandra CZAP; Adam-H. DE-HAVENON; Sushrut DHARMADHIKARI; Clifford-J. ESKEY; Mudassir FAROOQUI; Steven-K. FESKE; Nitin GOYAL; Kasey-B. GRIMMETT; Amy-K. GUZIK; Diogo-C. HAUSSEN; Majesta HOVINGH; Dinesh JILLELA; Peter-T. KAN; Rakesh KHATRI; Naim-N. KHOURY; Nicole-L. KILEY; Murali-K. KOLIKONDA; Stephanie LARA; Grace LI; Italo LINFANTE; Aaron-I. LOOCHTAN; Carlos-D. LOPEZ; Sarah LYCAN; Shailesh-S. MALE; Fadi NAHAB; Laith MAALI; Hesham-E. MASOUD; Jiangyong MIN; Santiago ORGETA-GUTIERREZ; Ghada-A. MOHAMED; Mahmoud MOHAMMADEN; Krishna NALLEBALLE; Yazan RADAIDEH; Pankajavalli RAMAKRISHNAN; Bliss RAYO-TARANTO; Diana-M. ROJAS-SOTO; Sean RULAND; Alexis-N. SIMPKINS; Sunil-A. SHETH; Amy-K. STAROSCIAK; Nicholas-E. TARLOV; Robert-A. TAYLOR; Barbara VOETSCH; Linda ZHANG; Hai-Quang DUONG; Viet-Phuong DAO; Huynh-Vu LE; Thong-Nhu PHAM; Mai-Duy TON; Anh-Duc TRAN; Osama-O. ZAIDAT; Paolo MACHI; Elisabeth DIRREN; Claudio RODRÍGUEZ-FERNÁNDEZ; Jorge ESCARTÍN-LÓPEZ; Jose-Carlos FERNÁNDEZ-FERRO; Niloofar MOHAMMADZADEH; Neil-C. SURYADEVARA,-MD; Beatriz DE-LA-CRUZ-FERNÁNDEZ; Filipe BESSA; Nina JANCAR; Megan BRADY; Dawn SCOZZARI.
Journal of Stroke ; : 256-265, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-938173

ABSTRACT

Background@#and Purpose Recent studies suggested an increased incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated the volume of CVT hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year. @*Methods@#We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 171 stroke centers from 49 countries. We recorded COVID-19 admission volumes, CVT hospitalization, and CVT in-hospital mortality from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. CVT diagnoses were identified by International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes or stroke databases. We additionally sought to compare the same metrics in the first 5 months of 2021 compared to the corresponding months in 2019 and 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04934020). @*Results@#There were 2,313 CVT admissions across the 1-year pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic year (2020); no differences in CVT volume or CVT mortality were observed. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT volumes compared to 2019 (27.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.2 to 32.0; P<0.0001) and 2020 (41.4%; 95% CI, 37.0 to 46.0; P<0.0001). A COVID-19 diagnosis was present in 7.6% (132/1,738) of CVT hospitalizations. CVT was present in 0.04% (103/292,080) of COVID-19 hospitalizations. During the first pandemic year, CVT mortality was higher in patients who were COVID positive compared to COVID negative patients (8/53 [15.0%] vs. 41/910 [4.5%], P=0.004). There was an increase in CVT mortality during the first 5 months of pandemic years 2020 and 2021 compared to the first 5 months of the pre-pandemic year 2019 (2019 vs. 2020: 2.26% vs. 4.74%, P=0.05; 2019 vs. 2021: 2.26% vs. 4.99%, P=0.03). In the first 5 months of 2021, there were 26 cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), resulting in six deaths. @*Conclusions@#During the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT hospitalization volume and CVT in-hospital mortality did not change compared to the prior year. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with higher CVT in-hospital mortality. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT hospitalization volume and increase in CVT-related mortality, partially attributable to VITT.

3.
Neurointervention ; : 100-109, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-730358

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Recent reports have posed doubts about the effect of preradiosurgical embolization in brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) because it makes the planning of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) difficult and has the risk of recanalization out of the target. We investigated whether the performance and quality of embolization may influence the success of SRS based on a retrospective case cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients who underwent embolization followed by SRS between 2003 and 2012 in eight institutes with neurointerventionists were considered. They were divided into the following two groups at 3 years of follow up after the final SRS: “successful occlusion group” (S group), with radiologically complete occlusion of AVM; and “non-successful occlusion group” (N group) with persistent remnant nidus or abnormal vascular networks. Patient background, AVM profile, embolization performance grade and complications were compared in each group. The quality of embolization was evaluated with the new grading system: embolization performance grade (E grade), specializing the achievement of nidus embolization. E grade A was defined as sufficient nidus embolization with more than half of the total number of feeders achieving nidus penetration. E grade B was defined as less than half achievement of nidus embolization, and E grade C was defines as failure to perform nidus embolization. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in the S group, and 29 patients were included in the N group. The size and Spetzler-Martin grade of AVM and the rate of diffuse type was higher in the N group without statistical significance. The embolization performance level according to E grade indicated a significantly higher rate of successful embolization with more than 50% of nidus penetration in the S group (P<0.001). This difference was also confirmed in the subanalysis for limited cases, excluding smaller AVMs with complete occlusion with SRS alone (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The cause of the unsuccessful result of post-embolization SRS might be the large, diffuse angioarchitecture, but proper embolization with a high rate of nidus penetration to avoid recanalization is more important. Effective embolization is essential to contribute to and promote the effect of radiosurgery.


Subject(s)
Humans , Academies and Institutes , Arteriovenous Malformations , Asian People , Brain , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Radiosurgery , Retrospective Studies
4.
Korean Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease ; : 82-87, 1999.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-159693

ABSTRACT

Since 1983, we have experienced endovascular treatment of intracranial AVMs.2)3) Superselective catheterization of feeding artery, embolization or feeding artery occlusion of the cerebral AVMs have been performed for 73 cases in 134 sessions. Endovascular treatment of intracranial AVMs such as embolization or feeding artery occlusion have been performed for 57 cases of AVMs in 95 sessions. In each time, endovascular approach was performed for two to five feeding arteries, so more than 300 feeding arteries were catheterized by microcatheters or balloon catheters. In this report, we present our experiences of endovascular treatment of intracranial AVMs and discuss embolic materials and the role of endovascular treatment of intracranial. AVMs.


Subject(s)
Arteries , Catheterization , Catheters
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL